
Choosing a sustainability reporting framework is one of the most important early decisions in the reporting process. It shapes how you collect data, structure your report, and communicate your impact — both internally and externally.
There’s no one-size-fits-all approach. In fact, most organizations use more than one framework. The key is to know your goals, audience, and capacity — and build from there.
The Four Pillars of Sustainability Reporting
Before diving into specific frameworks, it's helpful to understand the common structure of most sustainability and impact reports. Nearly all are organized around four thematic pillars:
1. Environmental
Focuses on how your organization affects (and responds to) the natural environment.
Topics may include:
- Energy consumption and efficiency
- Greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and 3)
- Water usage and management
- Waste production and recycling
- Biodiversity and ecosystem impacts
Framework alignment:
GRI Standards (300 series), SASB environmental metrics, and TCFD’s climate disclosures all emphasize these topics.
2. Social
Covers relationships with employees, communities, and customers.
Topics may include:
- Labor practices and working conditions
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)
- Human rights in the supply chain
- Community engagement and investment
- Product safety and customer responsibility
Framework alignment:
GRI (400 series), SASB’s sector-specific social topics, and B Impact Assessment all emphasize social metrics.
3. Governance
Deals with internal systems of accountability, ethics, and oversight.
Topics may include:
- Board structure and sustainability oversight
- Anti-corruption and business ethics
- Executive compensation linked to ESG goals
- Risk management systems
- Data privacy and cybersecurity
Framework alignment:
GRI (102 and 200 series), SASB governance indicators, and TCFD governance disclosures.
4. Economic
Reflects your contribution to financial sustainability and local economic development.
Topics may include:
- Economic value created and distributed
- Local procurement and job creation
- Business continuity and resilience
- Tax transparency and fair contribution
Framework alignment:
GRI (201 series), SASB financial metrics, and the Integrated Reporting framework.
Overview of Key Reporting Frameworks
Below is a detailed look at the most commonly used sustainability and impact reporting frameworks.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
The most widely adopted sustainability reporting framework. GRI is designed for transparency across economic, environmental, and social impacts, intended for a broad set of stakeholders — not just investors.
- Modular design: Universal Standards (basic disclosures), Sector Standards (industry-specific), and Topic Standards (e.g. emissions, labor, tax)
- Encourages organizations to report on their most material impacts (those most significant to society and the environment)
- Ideal for organizations seeking a holistic, stakeholder-centered report
- Can serve as a foundational framework, often supplemented by others (like SASB or SDGs)
✅ Use GRI if you want a full-spectrum report that shows accountability to employees, communities, and the public.
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)
SASB (now part of the ISSB) focuses on financial materiality — the ESG topics most likely to impact financial performance. It offers industry-specific standards for 77 sectors, each with defined metrics.
- Designed to produce comparable, decision-useful data for investors
- Often used alongside GRI: GRI for breadth, SASB for financial relevance
- Key topics are determined by materiality to enterprise value, not just social impact
- Widely adopted by public companies, particularly those under investor pressure to disclose ESG risk
✅ Use SASB if you’re a public or investor-facing company, especially in a high-impact sector (like energy, manufacturing, or tech).
Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
TCFD is focused specifically on climate-related risks and opportunities. It provides a structured approach to disclosing how climate change might affect your business — and how your business is managing that risk.
- Organized around four pillars: Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics & Targets
- Includes disclosures such as board oversight, scenario planning, carbon accounting
- Widely endorsed and becoming mandatory in several countries (e.g. the UK, EU, Japan)
- Often integrated into larger reports (either ESG or sustainability)
✅ Use TCFD if climate risk is material to your business — or if investors, regulators, or clients expect this level of disclosure.
B Corp & B Impact Assessment (BIA)
Used by certified B Corporations or values-led companies, the B Impact Assessment measures ESG performance across five categories: governance, workers, community, environment, and customers.
- Free to use and publicly available
- Required annually for B Corp certification
- Focuses on mission alignment and stakeholder value rather than financial risk
- Often includes both qualitative storytelling and quantitative metrics
- Particularly helpful for nonprofits, social enterprises, and startups with purpose-driven models
✅ Use BIA if you’re a mission-driven organization or pursuing B Corp certification — or want a structured but approachable impact lens.
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs)
The SDGs are not a reporting standard, but a global reference framework. Many organizations map their work to relevant SDG targets to show alignment with global priorities (e.g. climate, equity, health, justice).
- Aspirational and flexible
- Easily combined with other frameworks like GRI or BIA
- Useful for public-facing messaging or visual storytelling
- Many reports use icons or indexes to show SDG alignment by topic or goal
✅ Use the SDGs if you want to show how your efforts contribute to big-picture change — especially in communications or program areas.
Mixing and Matching Frameworks
You don’t have to choose just one. In fact, many organizations mix and match based on:
- Audience expectations (investors, customers, community)
- Regulatory context (e.g. CSRD in the EU, SEC in the US)
- Type of organization (corporate, nonprofit, startup)
- Available resources and reporting maturity
Common combinations:
- GRI + SASB + TCFD = For large or public companies balancing breadth and financial disclosure
- BIA + SDGs = For B Corps or social enterprises focused on impact and alignment
- GRI + SDGs = For nonprofits or community-focused orgs that want structure and storytelling
- GRI + TCFD = For companies with environmental risk exposure (e.g. food, transport, manufacturing)
When (and Why) to Commit to One Framework
You may want to fully follow a framework if:
- Your industry expects it (e.g. TCFD in financial services)
- You’re pursuing certification (e.g. B Corp, UN Global Compact)
- You want to say the report is “in accordance with GRI” — which has specific format and disclosure requirements
- You’re preparing for third-party assurance (auditing of data or processes)
Even then, you can still pull in elements from other frameworks to enrich your report.
In a nutshell
GRI
Primary Strength: Broad ESG disclosures for all stakeholders
Best For: Any organization aiming for transparency and completeness
SASB/ISSB
Primary Strength: Industry-specific metrics tied to financial risk
Best For: Investor-facing reports, especially for public companies
TCFD
Primary Strength: Climate risk and scenario analysis
Best For: Climate-exposed sectors, regulated industries
BIA (B Corp)
Primary Strength: Stakeholder-driven holistic impact
Best For: Mission-driven orgs, B Corps, social enterprises
UN SDGs
Primary Strength: Global development goal alignment
Best For: Public engagement, social impact storytelling
Bottom Line
Think of frameworks like tools — not rulebooks. The goal is not to tick boxes but to communicate clearly, credibly, and consistently.
Start with what matters most to your organization and stakeholders. Then use the frameworks that help you structure and support that message — without overcomplicating the process.

Guide to Creating Impact, ESG and Sustainability Reports
A Practical Guide to Impact and Sustainability Reporting
Published

Why Sustainability Reporting Matters
A Way to Earn Trust, Align Strategy, and Drive Real Progress
Published

Tools for Building Reports
Platforms, software, and workflows that actually work for real teams
Published

Best Practices and Common Pitfalls
What credible reports get right — and where others fall short
Published

ESG vs. Sustainability Reporting: What's the Difference?
What's the Difference Between an Impact Report, Sustainability Report, and ESG Report?
Published

Resources and Templates
Tools to get started, stay organized, and keep improving
Published

Gathering and Managing Data
How to Collect, Verify, and Organize the Data You’ll Need
Published

Materiality: Focusing on What Matters Most
Not every topic belongs in your sustainability or impact report. That’s where materiality comes in.
Published

Structuring the Report — Sections and Flow
What to Include, and in What Order
Published

Writing the Report — Tone, Style, and Clarity
Striking the Right Balance Between Facts and Voice
Published

Design and Accessibility
Good Design Makes a Better Report
Published

Sharing, Publishing, and Promoting Your Report
Get it out — and make it count
Published